The spontaneous horse
Looking at the horse without expectations
Too often we can’t see the spontaneous behaviour of horses because they are too much trained for human purposes, losing their normal behaviour and part of their individuality. Even when a horse shows something of an own intention, it is often judged upon as an attempt to undermind the horse-human interaction. The horses’ self-expression in the relationship with human is mostly suppressed and controlled (for example moving the head while haltering or moving while saddling). Rarely it is seen or interpretated as a moment of dialogue in which both human and horse are entering in interaction with eachother.
In the zooanthropological approach and in zooanthropological equitation, it is fundamental to give the horse the possibility to express his own world and spontaneous behaviour. When we, as human, pay attention to the horse and create room for his expressiveness we start an inter-species relationship.
But what are the spontaneous behaviours of a horse?
As horses are often seen as anxious, unpredictable animals, the fear to let them express themselves, convinced that this might be dangerous, actually makes them anxious and unpredictable animals. Which is a strange vicious circle. For example, the fear off being bitten by a horse makes us push away their head every time they try to understand us by smelling us from closeby or exploring us with the lips. The pushing or even harsher actions transforms that same intention for understanding into a more tensed situation.
In the same way we deny them their social behaviour. In our society horses live too often in social isolation, so they can’t express themselves through social behaviour and this is something that by now we all know (even if most horses continue to live that way).
Social isolation
But even when they live with other horses, the groups are often not permanent, not familiar or familiar-like. The horses in these groups change often, so even then they can‘t express themselves (in their natural cognitive way) as there interaction is often focused on defensive behaviour and not exactly social. Social behaviours are not only reactive behaviours as for example dominance/leadership dynamics, which are just short episodes in a family group. Social behaviours are subtle, small gestures and often not much visible behaviours that have an important cohesive function for a herd. It is much more then mutual grooming, which is an expressing that can also be part of an attempt to reduce tension. It is, for example, observing eachother and the herd dynamics, looking from a distance while eating grass, pre-conflict behaviour to avoid tension, smelling eachother to better understand a certain situation.
Social communication
An other group of spontaneous behaviours that we deny to the horse is investigative/explorative behaviour. Fundamental for the correct development of cognitive functions. In fact people often use techniques, methods and tools that deprive the horse of the opportunity to explore his reference context, other horses, the human and himself.
Spontaneus behaviours deprivation
Often horse spontaneus behaviours are limited to complicated bits and bridles. The more we expect precise behaviour and complicated exercises from a horse when ridden (and not), the bigger the impediment to the expression of their own spontaneous behaviours. Spontaneous behaviours are important for the horse also when we ride it, because of this behaviours are important to improving cognitive dialogue from the saddle and reducing reactive/defensive behaviour due often to suppression of spontaneous behaviours.
Equine vibrissae (whiskers) | Tactile investigative behaviour
Also some grooming approaches as clipping the horse’s vibrissae (whiskers), depriving the horse to explore in appropriate way, as they are important for the sensory receptors, using his spontaneous behaviours and so inducing stress factors, in the same time reducing welfare.
The reduction of the sponteneous behaviour often happens already during the initial training of young horses. In these moments the horses lives a strong reduction of their natural spontaneous behaviours to improve behaviour functional for human anthropocentric desires. Operant conditioning applied during these moment (with negative or positive reinforcement) drastically reducing spontaneous behaviours and so reducing equine welfare.
Negative Reinforcement (Operant conditioning and expectations)
Negative Reinforcement (Operant conditioning and expectations)
Positive Reinforcement (Operant conditioning and expectations)
Positive Reinforcement (Operant conditioning and expectations)
In a different way, the zooanthropological approach facilitates spontaneous behaviours in horses, give so the opportunity to create their own mental map as social map, learning map, human-horse relationship map, using their own mental and physical capacities, without conditioning.
The behaviour is an expression of a state of mind and not the result of direct automatic external or internal stimuli. The behaviouristic theories of the early twentieth century, are obsolete and we must have clear it.
Below a list of pictures about spontaneous behaviours and spontaneous horses during our practical activities:
Novel object shared investigation (without conditioning or expectations)
Shared social exploration (without conditioning or expectations)
Known object shared investigation (without conditioning or expectations)
Novel object shared investigation (without conditioning or expectations)
Social dynamics (without conditioning or expectations)
Known object social investigation (without conditioning or expectations)
Attention, awareness, relaxation, contact and social interaction are keywords in a spontaneous interaction.
Video about Learning Animals and The Cognitive Horse:
Writers: Francesco De Giorgio, José Schoorl, http://www.learninganimals.com
Photo: José Schoorl, internet
Francesco De Giorgio
Born in 1965 in Italy, where he is a renowned biologist, ethologist and applied behavioural researcher, Francesco De Giorgio is member of the Ethics Committee of ISAE (International Society for Applied Ethology), specialized in equine and canine ethology. He is founder, developer and facilitator at the Learning Animals | International Institute for Zooanthropology, where he focuses principally on the study of animal-human interaction, ethics, animal personal growth and rehabilitation.
Graduating from Parma University in 1989, Francesco began his career as an independent field researcher, supporting several universities whilst indulging his lifelong passion for horses and dogs as an Equine and Canine Learning Professional – helping owners to enhance their relationships with animals.
Described by International School of Ethology (Erice, IT), Director Danilo Mainardi as “a man who works with his head and his heart and his hands”, Francesco walks the talk – integrating scientific knowledge into ethical day-to-day practice.
An expert in equine and canine welfare, Francesco provides expert support for institutions occupied with animal Health and Welfare (e.g. in equine mistreatment cases), has served on a number of ethics committees, and acts as an advisor to courts, police and equine rehabilitation centres.
Much sought-after as both a speaker and lecturer, Francesco speaks regularly on ‘Cognitive Ethology in the Animal-Human Relationship’. He also lectures at several universities and has presented to numerous conferences and symposia on ethology, cognition and zooanthropology and published the books “Horse- Human dictionary” (in italian) and “The Cognitive Horse” (in english).
José Schoorl
Francesco’s partner in both life and work, Dutch born José Schoorl personifies the bridge between equine perception and human understanding. Their shared passion for horses and keen insight in social dynamics brought them together and today they live in the Netherlands with their eight horse companions, four dogs and two cats.
After many years of change adviser and personal development consultant, she is, today, a renowned proponent of the zooanthropological approach, working for the change in awareness and understanding of the Animal-Human Relationship.
As consultant and teacher at the Learning Animals Institute for Zooanthropology, José strives to improve people’s understanding of cognition and relationship dynamics, and in so doing to enhance their relationship with animals.
Contending that a firm grasp of equine cognition is the vital first step to understanding horses’ behaviour, José is a real force for change; inspiring and promoting fresh thinking in her writing and in her lectures and creating effective personal growth trajectories for individuals through free interaction with horses.
A regular guest lecturer and speaker in zooanthropology and personal growth, José has presented to conferences and symposia throughout Europe.
Comments on: "The spontaneous horse" (9)
I think this is all so true. Time for observation of horses without expectations or judgement is key and so often this time does not exist for owners, riders, and trainers. All they are really interested in is using the horse for some end and then off to the next horse or something else. It is really sad for both the horse and rider because both miss out on so much quality of relationship.
Excellent article. I occasionally introduce new objects to my horse and though I normally have him in a halter with lead rope, I let him approach and investigate the object(s). He has always been curious and I try to encourage him as much as possible. Prefer to keep him inquisitive rather than spooking and fleeing when seeing something new. much safer for both of us!
I absolutely love your work and am so glad I have found your site. These have been my thoughts for a long time, just didn’t know how to put it succinctly! Am working on a MSc in Equine Ethology and I know that your work will greatly influence mine. Thank you for what you are doing for the horses! 🙂
I really enjoyed your article. My husband and I have been working together for over 20 years as dolphin “trainers”. We of course use operant conditioning, and the marine mammal industry uses positive reinforcement as well. That said, we have seen such an advance in how handlers manage their animal’s well being through more progressive methods including enrichment. Environmental enrichment (now standard operating procedure in zoos and aquariums in the U.S.) is meant to stimulate animals mentally, allowing them to investigate novel objects, smells, visual objects etc. This is allowing them to be spontaneous and be “themselves” wothout any expectations. In addition, many new school trainers want to avoid frustrating their animals and will often try to make sessions with their animals fun. Unfortunately, many trainers overlook the subtleties of animal communication and miss what the animal is trying to tell them. They fail to make a connection with the animal.
In an attempt to work with the dolphins in our care more harmoneously, we developed a method of tactile reinforcement. Touch, and in particular, pectoral fin rubs are essential for bonding and reassurance with both whales and dolphins. We incorporated this into our program as well as allowing the dolphins to come to us on their own terms for tactile rub downs. They were not reinforcesd with food for this and were not required to come to us.
Finally, we would enter the water with the dolphins and just start swimming. We would not swim after them, but rather, gave the dolphins the opportunity to join us if they wished to swim all together as one big pod. The bond and relationship we built up with the dolphins in the end proved to be extremely valuable, and even though we still “trained” the dolphins we had much more cooperation and a better quality behavior because we felt we were working as a team and not as a dominant person over a subdominant animal.
Thank you so much for giving us this very clear and interesting feedback. What you write about the swimming seems to be very similar as experience towards our riding approach. We are very happy to know that you made it possible to enrich and deepen your relationship with the dolphins. When we exchange in congress environmnet (e.g. minding animals) the dolphin is often named as operant condition example, and we wondered if there would not have been a development. Beautiful the tactile rub downs example. Enjoy the good work and relationships!
Francesco & José
Thanks for your prompt response! Interestingly enough, my husband and I often compare dolphin’s social dynamics to horses. I was so excited to see your post and will be looking into the work you are doing in more depth. I think you have hit on a very important element in animal/human interactions. I am in the process of starting a blog about working with dolphins and I want to touch more on working with animals on a higher, more nuanced level. There seems to me to be a deep connection that can be forged between humans and animals and it can be hard to teach trainers this connection, being that it is more abstract as you know. I thank you again and am facinated with all you are doing!!!
Liz – can you post the link to your blog? Even though my work is with horses, I would be very interested in following your work with the dolphins. thanks!
sarah
Hi Sarah, I will post my link to this blog soon and will keep you posted. Thanks for asking about it. Take care. Liz
😀 Reminds me of an occassion during my field study recording feral pony behaviour. The foals gathered around me while I sat on a rock with my clip board to take the notes. The foals were very curious to see, smell and touch my notes too. I’d been following them for several weeks and had become part of their day to day scene. So good to share your similar experiences and how we can participate with horses 😀