Equine Cognitive Revolution
The important field of cognitive ethology is mainly related with paradigms regarding perception, learning, categorization, memory, spatial cognition, numerosity, communication, language, social cognition, theory of mind, causal reasoning, and metacognition.
Cognitive ethology is also related to a philosofical discussion concerning the anthropocentric and not-anthropocentric vision of the world. It will have a huge cultural impact regarding our relationship with animals. With the question of Animal Awareness, Donald Griﬃn sought to revolutionize the science of animal behavior by insisting that questions about animal consciousness should be placed ﬁrmly in the foreground of a new research-program he labeled ‘‘cognitive ethology.’’
Questions about animal awareness and consciousness are just one corner of a more general set of questions about animal cognition and mind. The so-called “cognitive revolution” that took place during the latter half of the 20th century has already led to many innovative research-experiments by comparative psychologists and ethologists probing the cognitive capacities of animals.
The way of cognitive ethology will revolutionize with ever more power our relationship with animals, especially the horse-human relationship. In classical equestrian world, but also ‘natural horsemanship’ world, ‘clicker training’ world and even the ‘coaching with horses’ world, the animal and also horse-human relationship is still very much defined from a mechanical and behaviouristic point of view. Interaction between horse and human is continuously defined focussing on the behavior we desire from the horse.
Most animals might not stimulate the cognitive interest of human, but at least in their living with humans are more or less left in their own environment. The horse instead almost never lives in an own social environment and their interaction with human is one with continuous expectations.
Horse life is scheduled into phases in which it is pre-defined what it should learn in which moment: handling, haltering, walking, having a saddle. We very precisely define what and when it should learn things, without showing resistance or own initiatives, to respond to our requirements.
So what does this cultural new vision mean, not mechanical and behaviouristic? How is it possible in horse-human relationship? What must we change about our activities with the horses? What impact will it have?
A horse has the capacity and the need to develope his cognition. To understand the world he is living in. Smell it, see it, listen to it, explore it, investigate it. And who are we to decide for the horse if he can or cannot do so?
Start observing the horse.
Create space and time for the horse to explore his environment.
Decentare yourself in the interaction with the horse.
One of the caracteristics of cognitive learning is the latency. Often you cannot see the immediate result of the learning process. What was elaborated might be used in a future moment, if necessary, and when the circumstance call it. In the cognitive-relationship approach, based on zooanthropological philosophy, it is not interesting what the horse learn, but how it lives the experience together with other horses and/or with human. In fact one of most important aspects in applied equine cognitive ethology is the learning path, not the learning results.
It changes practically everything. But it will bring back a horse free of tension. A horse that is able to elaborate his environment and cope with changes in it. It creates the possibility to have an ethical and sound horse human-relationship, in which both are able and free to express themselves.
Some examples if you want read more:
– Proceedings of the International Equine Science Meeting 2008/2012 by Kostanze Krueger
– Species of Mind by Colin Allen and Marc Bekoff
Text authors: Francesco De Giorgio, José Maria Schoorl
Photo author: José Maria Schoorl
Learning Horse | Nederlands
Comments on: "Equine Cognitive Revolution" (1)
Excellent to see this discussion. I have watched many horses in shows by “whisperers”, natural horsemanship proponents” and etc pushing horses for up to an hour to repeat actions in order demonstrate “leadership” or “obedience” – without regard to whether the horse can physically carry out the actions or is extremely stressed.